Yesterday morning was particularly tough.
It started fine, if a bit early, at 6:00 AM. I heard Beckett clamber out of bed, both feet hitting the floor with a convincing thud and up to full speed without missing a beat.
We fell into the usual weekend routine, a little episode of “Elmo,” and a little lazy lounging on the couch.
Then, it started.
Kick.
“Beckett, please don’t kick daddy’s computer,” I said in my best I-really-mean-business voice.
Kick, kick.
“Beckett, I asked you not to kick the computer,” I said askance, “why did you kick it?”
Kick! kick!, kick! as he fixed his gaze on me.
“Beckett, I mean it….”
KICK!
If it was intended to get a rise out of me, it succeeded. Exasperated, I pulled out the “nuclear” option, “Go to the corner, Beckett, you are getting a time out!”
And nuclear it went.
All semblance of order shattered as Beckett disintegrated into one of his unholy tantrums. I picked him up kicking and screaming, determined to force the issue and hold my ground as a little voice in my head chided me, You can’t let him run all over you.
This went on for half an hour. He would escalate, I would withdraw. He would escalate some more, scream louder, cry harder, stomp his feet more pitifully, run to me wailing a jumbled mix of ‘NOooo’s and ‘DadDaddyaHoldDaddyHolMe’s, and through it all, I would grit my teeth and ignore him even more.
Ignore him, don’t reinforce bad behavior, don’t coddle him! Is this what I am supposed to do?
Predictably, it ended in one of the usual patterns. This time C intervened and managed to coax him off the cliff. As his sobs quieted down to a whimper, we hugged, and I tried to explain why daddy got mad.
I don’t suppose I expected him to back down. If it were me, I wouldn’t have. I asked him if he understood what I was trying to tell him, “Yesh,” he replied reflexively, but it felt like that was what he thought I wanted to hear, and the whole thing felt sadly pointless.
I have been turning over this episode in the last 24 hours or so, trying to unpack this complicated mix of emotions about the whole experience. Perhaps, it feels wrong because it was a conscious disciplinary effort, and I am stepping far outside my natural comfort zone. Quite possibly, I am just not that “tough” of a parent, and this feels like an act because it is one.
The thing is, I am not sure I what I’ve accomplished by channeling my inner Tiger Dad. Specifically, I am having deep misgivings about what I thought I was supposed to be doing. If pressed, I might say I was acting to correct a “bad behavior,” and I think I am supposed to correct bad behaviors.
What exactly is bad behavior?
It seems to me that all this assumes that our underlying model about children’s behavior and how to nurture them is right in the first place; that there is a conscious moral component behind children’s behavior (bad vs. good), and our efforts to control them is a good thing in the long run.
I am not so sure. I don’t have all of this worked out, but I think the some of my anxieties about the Tiger Dad approach comes down to the following things:
- It feels coercive and manipulative — that somehow “love” has a price and our relationship is conditional or transactional. “If I don’t do X, Daddy won’t give me Y.” Mostly, I worry that the only “Y” in this equation he cares about is “love.”
- I worry that I am teaching him to modulate his behavior on the basis of external considerations first when what really matters, I think, is not that he behaves properly in a performative sense, but that he does so because he is intrinsically motivated.
- That I am missing some greater, more constructive, more transformative way to teach him about himself and the world.
One slightly tangential thought: are Tiger Bosses considered good leaders or motivators? I haven’t come across any leadership management literature or research that suggests so. Maybe, Steve Jobs is the exception, or maybe he is just badly understood. But it seems to me that we don’t motivate highly effective teams this way; why would we do so with two year olds?